Malang, 29 December 2017
I saw someone commented on someone else's post like this:
Then, I posted a status based on that comment:
And some people who were "baited" were commenting to my post:
It is so funny that I didn't mention any particular religion but they are triggered as if their religion is being attacked.
It is so obvious that they are feeling uneasy with my post because they are all denial. It is so obvious from their comments that they try to justify what I just said about them.
And also, they have been acting as a "god" by defining what other religions' sins are including. They have been unconsciously limiting the options of religion can be chosen and what those religions can cover about.
Probably, there is no yet two religions which have equal power to fight each other. But what we have now is one majority that often opresses minorities merely based on majority's belief, let's say about homosexuality.
Even within one same religion, the people often cannot agree among themselves. It is so hard to tell whose interpretation about their religion are the rightest one. Since they are within the same religion, the tension of intoleration is actually much stronger.
People in each sub-group of a religion think they have the rightest interpretation thus they are the most deserving to claim the religion. And, since other sub-groups are considered wrong to be "that religion", the one who thinks they are right may fight the other sub-groups. It happens to Shia, Ahmaddiyya, and so.
What I wrote on my post was just a simple illustration, but it actually means much wider than what it is literally written. Can those denial hypocrites understand about this logic? Absolutely no. They are used to judge other people based on their interpretation, literally. That's why I said it is so obvious from their comments that they are denial hypocrites.
It is so obvious that they are feeling uneasy with my post because they are all denial. It is so obvious from their comments that they try to justify what I just said about them.
And also, they have been acting as a "god" by defining what other religions' sins are including. They have been unconsciously limiting the options of religion can be chosen and what those religions can cover about.
Probably, there is no yet two religions which have equal power to fight each other. But what we have now is one majority that often opresses minorities merely based on majority's belief, let's say about homosexuality.
Even within one same religion, the people often cannot agree among themselves. It is so hard to tell whose interpretation about their religion are the rightest one. Since they are within the same religion, the tension of intoleration is actually much stronger.
People in each sub-group of a religion think they have the rightest interpretation thus they are the most deserving to claim the religion. And, since other sub-groups are considered wrong to be "that religion", the one who thinks they are right may fight the other sub-groups. It happens to Shia, Ahmaddiyya, and so.
What I wrote on my post was just a simple illustration, but it actually means much wider than what it is literally written. Can those denial hypocrites understand about this logic? Absolutely no. They are used to judge other people based on their interpretation, literally. That's why I said it is so obvious from their comments that they are denial hypocrites.
